[FIR] Rework resolution of declaration statuses

There is introduced algorithm of resolution with jumps: before
  resolution of some class we resolve all status of members of its
  supertypes, so we can properly determine inherited visibility
  and modifiers
This commit is contained in:
Dmitriy Novozhilov
2020-09-28 15:30:51 +03:00
parent 0b8116dff0
commit bf1a00c73a
35 changed files with 858 additions and 180 deletions
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ class G : F() {
}
fun test_fun_stays_protected(g: G) {
g.protected_fun()
g.<!HIDDEN!>protected_fun<!>()
}
//------------
@@ -82,4 +82,4 @@ interface Q : R {
class S : P, Q {
internal override fun foo() {}
}
}
+2 -2
View File
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ class B : A() {
}
fun test(b: B) {
b.x()
b.<!HIDDEN!>x<!>()
}
@@ -37,4 +37,4 @@ class F : C(), T {
class G : C(), T {
public override fun foo() {}
}
}
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ class KotlinClass2 : JavaClass() {
fun test(a: KotlinClass, b: KotlinClass2) {
a.<!HIDDEN!>foo<!>() // Error, protected_and_package declared in different package
b.foo() // Error, protected visibility in same package (but could be protected_and_package)
b.<!HIDDEN!>foo<!>() // Error, protected visibility in same package (but could be protected_and_package)
a.<!HIDDEN!>field<!>
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ open class A {
fun bar(x: B) {
x.foo() // OK, foo declared in A
x.<!HIDDEN!>baz<!>() // Declared in B
x.foobaz() // Declared in B
x.<!HIDDEN!>foobaz<!>() // Declared in B
}
}