JVM_IR KT-29822 KT-48669 loop over unsigned array, indices, withIndex

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/forLoop/unsigned/forInUnsignedArray.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+// WITH_RUNTIME
+
+// IMPORTANT!
+// Please, when your changes cause failures in bytecodeText tests for 'for' loops,
+// examine the resulting bytecode shape carefully.
+// Range and progression-based loops generated with Kotlin compiler should be
+// as close as possible to Java counter loops ('for (int i = a; i < b; ++i) { ... }').
+// Otherwise it may result in performance regression due to missing HotSpot optimizations.
+// Run Kotlin compiler benchmarks (https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlin-benchmarks)
+// with compiler built from your changes if you are not sure.
+
+fun test(uis: UIntArray): UInt {
+    var s = 0U
+    for (ui in uis) {
+        s += ui
+    }
+    return s
+}
+
+// 0 iterator
+// 0 getStart
+// 0 getEnd
+// 0 getFirst
+// 0 getLast
+// 1 IF_ICMPGE
+// 0 IF_ICMPGT
+// 0 IF_ICMPLE
+// 1 IF
+
+// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
+// 6 ILOAD
+// 5 ISTORE
+// 1 IADD
+// 0 ISUB
+// 1 IINC

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/forLoop/unsigned/forInUnsignedArrayIndices.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// WITH_RUNTIME
+
+// IMPORTANT!
+// Please, when your changes cause failures in bytecodeText tests for 'for' loops,
+// examine the resulting bytecode shape carefully.
+// Range and progression-based loops generated with Kotlin compiler should be
+// as close as possible to Java counter loops ('for (int i = a; i < b; ++i) { ... }').
+// Otherwise it may result in performance regression due to missing HotSpot optimizations.
+// Run Kotlin compiler benchmarks (https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlin-benchmarks)
+// with compiler built from your changes if you are not sure.
+
+fun test(uis: UIntArray): UInt {
+    var s = 0U
+    for (i in uis.indices) {
+        s += uis[i]
+    }
+    return s
+}
+
+// 0 iterator
+// 0 getStart
+// 0 getEnd
+
+// JVM_TEMPLATES
+// 1 getFirst
+// 1 getLast
+// 0 IF_ICMPGE
+// 1 IF_ICMPGT
+// 0 IF_ICMPLE
+// 2 IF
+
+// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
+// 0 getFirst
+// 0 getLast
+// 1 IF_ICMPGE
+// 0 IF_ICMPGT
+// 0 IF_ICMPLE
+// 1 IF
+
+// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
+// 5 ILOAD
+// 4 ISTORE
+// 1 IADD
+// 0 ISUB
+// 1 IINC

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/forLoop/unsigned/forInUnsignedArrayWithIndex.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+// WITH_RUNTIME
+// IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
+
+// IMPORTANT!
+// Please, when your changes cause failures in bytecodeText tests for 'for' loops,
+// examine the resulting bytecode shape carefully.
+// Range and progression-based loops generated with Kotlin compiler should be
+// as close as possible to Java counter loops ('for (int i = a; i < b; ++i) { ... }').
+// Otherwise it may result in performance regression due to missing HotSpot optimizations.
+// Run Kotlin compiler benchmarks (https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlin-benchmarks)
+// with compiler built from your changes if you are not sure.
+
+fun test(uis: UIntArray): UInt {
+    var s = 0U
+    for ((i, ui) in uis.withIndex()) {
+        s += ui
+    }
+    return s
+}
+
+// JVM_TEMPLATES
+// 1 withIndex
+// 1 iterator
+// 1 hasNext
+// 1 next
+// 1 component1
+// 1 component2
+// 0 ARRAYLENGTH
+// 1 ICONST_0
+
+// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
+// 0 withIndex
+// 0 iterator
+// 0 hasNext
+// 0 next
+// 0 component1
+// 0 component2
+// 1 INVOKESTATIC kotlin\/UIntArray\.getSize\-impl \(\[I\)I
+// 2 ICONST_0
+
+// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
+// 7 ILOAD
+// 6 ISTORE
+// 1 IADD
+// 0 ISUB
+// 1 IINC