Fix algorithm of determining modality for fake overrides
Previously we inferred "open" if there was at least one open member in the hierarchy. However, that's not correct when that member is overridden by another member in the hierarchy which is abstract. This led to incorrect code being accepted by the front-end, and an exception during the bridge generation #KT-12467 Fixed
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||
interface A {
|
||||
fun foo() {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
interface B : A {
|
||||
abstract override fun foo()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
interface C : A {
|
||||
abstract override fun foo()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
interface D : A {
|
||||
override fun foo() = super.foo()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Fake override Z#foo should be open
|
||||
<!MANY_INTERFACES_MEMBER_NOT_IMPLEMENTED!>class Z<!> : B, C, D
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user