Common supertypes: unwrap captured type from DNN type during recursion control

Browse Source

This commit handles subtle situation when K1 represents flexible type
arguments as just T..T?, but K2 does it as T&Any..T?.
This can provoke a type like Captured(*)&Any..Captured(*)?,
and before this commit we couldn't find recursion inside Captured(*)&Any.
This could lead to explosions inside type system and inference errors

#KT-60581 Fixed

...

This commit is contained in:

Mikhail Glukhikh

2023-09-21 14:22:49 +02:00

committed by Space Team

parent 610a9d9c6a

commit aea7b8f00a

5 changed files with 4 additions and 92 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

compiler/testData/diagnostics/testsWithStdLib/inference/recursiveFlexibleAssertions.fir.kt

Vendored

+1 -3

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long