Common supertypes: unwrap captured type from DNN type during recursion control

This commit handles subtle situation when K1 represents flexible type
arguments as just T..T?, but K2 does it as T&Any..T?.
This can provoke a type like Captured(*)&Any..Captured(*)?,
and before this commit we couldn't find recursion inside Captured(*)&Any.
This could lead to explosions inside type system and inference errors

#KT-60581 Fixed

This commit is contained in:

Mikhail Glukhikh

2023-09-21 14:22:49 +02:00

committed by

Space Team

parent 610a9d9c6a

commit aea7b8f00a

5 changed files with 4 additions and 92 deletions

									
										compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/inference/assertThatInNumerousIf.kt
									
Vendored

		+1
		
												View File
												
				@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@

				// FIR_IDENTICAL

				// ISSUE: KT-60581

				// WITH_STDLIB