JVM IR: do not mangle property accessors of unsigned types in annotations
Before this change, we incorrectly mangled the names of annotation methods (e.g. `getI-pVg5ArA` instead of `i`) because the isSpecial condition was false.
This commit is contained in:
+5
@@ -230,6 +230,11 @@ public class BytecodeListingTestGenerated extends AbstractBytecodeListingTest {
|
||||
public void testOnReceiver() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/annotations/onReceiver.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("unsignedTypes.kt")
|
||||
public void testUnsignedTypes() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/annotations/unsignedTypes.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/collectionStubs")
|
||||
|
||||
+5
@@ -230,6 +230,11 @@ public class IrBytecodeListingTestGenerated extends AbstractIrBytecodeListingTes
|
||||
public void testOnReceiver() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/annotations/onReceiver.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("unsignedTypes.kt")
|
||||
public void testUnsignedTypes() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/annotations/unsignedTypes.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/collectionStubs")
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user