Do not suggest "convert to object" for sealed sub-classes with state
So #KT-24816 Fixed
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
// PROBLEM: none
|
||||
|
||||
abstract class Base(var x: String)
|
||||
|
||||
sealed class Sealed(s: String) : Base(s)
|
||||
|
||||
<caret>class Derived : Sealed("123")
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user