[Spec tests] Remove spec info from fir tests

2020-05-25 22:02:58 +03:00
parent 5ba9d09278
commit 9d862aaa1d
391 changed files with 0 additions and 3742 deletions
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (NEGATIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, initialization
- * NUMBER: 1
- * DESCRIPTION: val/var reassignment and/or uninitialized variable usages based on CallsInPlace effect with wrong invocation kind
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1() {
    val value_1: Int
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (NEGATIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, initialization
- * NUMBER: 2
- * DESCRIPTION: val/var reassignment and/or uninitialized variable usages based on nested CallsInPlace effects with wrong invocation kind
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1() {
    val value_1: Int
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (NEGATIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, initialization
- * NUMBER: 3
- * DESCRIPTION: val/var reassignment and/or uninitialized variable usages with compelx control flow inside/outside lambda of contract function with CallsInPlace effect
- * HELPERS: enumClasses, contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1(value_1: EnumClass?) {
    val value_2: Int
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (NEGATIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, initialization
- * NUMBER: 4
- * DESCRIPTION: CallsInPlace contract functions with name shadowing and wrong invocation kind
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1() {
    val value_1: Int
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (NEGATIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, initialization
- * NUMBER: 5
- * DESCRIPTION: CallsInPlace contract functions with invalid lambda passing to function parameter.
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1() {
    val value_1: Int
@@ -1,17 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (NEGATIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, initialization
- * NUMBER: 6
- * DESCRIPTION: Check the lack of CallsInPlace effect on the lambda in the parentheses.
- * UNEXPECTED BEHAVIOUR
- * ISSUES: KT-26229
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1() {
    val value_1: Int
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (POSITIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, initialization
- * NUMBER: 3
- * DESCRIPTION: val/var assignments or subsequent usages with compelx control flow inside/outside lambda of contract function with CallsInPlace effect
- * HELPERS: enumClasses, contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1(value_1: EnumClass?) {
    val value_2: Int
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (POSITIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, initialization
- * NUMBER: 4
- * DESCRIPTION: CallsInPlace contract functions with name shadowing
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1() {
    val value_1: Int
@@ -1,16 +1,5 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (POSITIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, initialization
- * NUMBER: 6
- * DESCRIPTION: Check the lack of CallsInPlace effect on the lambda in the parentheses.
- * UNEXPECTED BEHAVIOUR
- * ISSUES: KT-26229
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // FILE: contracts.kt

 package contracts
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (NEGATIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, unreachableCode
- * NUMBER: 1
- * DESCRIPTION: Using not allowed break and continue inside lambda of contract function
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1(value_1: Boolean) {
    while (value_1) {
@@ -2,15 +2,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (POSITIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, unreachableCode
- * NUMBER: 1
- * DESCRIPTION: Unreachable code detection using contract function with CallsInPlace effect
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1() {
    funWithExactlyOnceCallsInPlace {
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (POSITIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, unreachableCode
- * NUMBER: 3
- * DESCRIPTION: Unreachable code detection using local functions or labdas combined with contract functions with CallsInPlace effect
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1() {
    funWithExactlyOnceCallsInPlace {
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (POSITIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, unreachableCode
- * NUMBER: 4
- * DESCRIPTION: Unreachable code detection using nested contract functions with CallsInPlace effect
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1() {
    funWithExactlyOnceCallsInPlace {
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (POSITIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, unreachableCode
- * NUMBER: 5
- * DESCRIPTION: Unreachable code detection using contract functions with complex control flow inside
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1(b: Boolean?) {
    funWithExactlyOnceCallsInPlace {
@@ -1,15 +1,6 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts
 // SKIP_TXT

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (POSITIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, unreachableCode
- * NUMBER: 6
- * DESCRIPTION: Check for lack of unreachable code report when in complex control flow of contract function lambda not all branches are doing non-local return
- * HELPERS: contractFunctions
- */
-
 // TESTCASE NUMBER: 1
 fun case_1(b: Boolean?, c: Boolean) {
    funWithExactlyOnceCallsInPlace {
@@ -1,14 +1,5 @@
 // !USE_EXPERIMENTAL: kotlin.contracts.ExperimentalContracts

-/*
- * KOTLIN DIAGNOSTICS NOT LINKED SPEC TEST (POSITIVE)
- *
- * SECTIONS: contracts, analysis, controlFlow, unreachableCode
- * NUMBER: 7
- * DESCRIPTION: Smart initialization with correspond contract function with default value before lambda.
- * ISSUES: KT-26444
- */
-
 // FILE: contracts.kt

 package contracts