Maintain proper evaluation order for 'a in x .. y'

As of Kotlin 1.0 and 1.1, expression 'a in x .. y' is considered
equivalent to 'x.rangeTo(y).a', and should be evaluated in the following
order:
1. x
2. y
3. a
4. compare x with a
5. compare y with a (if needed)

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/contains/evaluationOrderForComparableRange.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+// WITH_RUNTIME
+
+val order = StringBuilder()
+
+inline fun expectOrder(at: String, expected: String, body: () -> Unit) {
+    order.setLength(0)
+    body()
+    if (order.toString() != expected) {
+        throw AssertionError("$at: expected: '$expected', actual: '$order'")
+    }
+}
+
+class Z(val x: Int) : Comparable<Z> {
+    override fun compareTo(other: Z): Int {
+        order.append("c:$x,${other.x} ")
+        return x.compareTo(other.x)
+    }
+}
+
+fun z(i: Int): Z {
+    order.append("z:$i ")
+    return Z(i)
+}
+
+fun box(): String {
+    expectOrder("z0 in z1 .. z3", "z:1 z:3 z:0 c:1,0 ") { z(0) in z(1) .. z(3) }
+    expectOrder("z2 in z1 .. z3", "z:1 z:3 z:2 c:1,2 c:3,2 ") { z(2) in z(1) .. z(3) }
+    expectOrder("z4 in z1 .. z3", "z:1 z:4 z:2 c:1,2 c:4,2 ") { z(2) in z(1) .. z(4) }
+
+    expectOrder("z0 !in z1 .. z3", "z:1 z:3 z:0 c:1,0 ") { z(0) !in z(1) .. z(3) }
+    expectOrder("z2 !in z1 .. z3", "z:1 z:3 z:2 c:1,2 c:3,2 ") { z(2) !in z(1) .. z(3) }
+    expectOrder("z4 !in z1 .. z3", "z:1 z:4 z:2 c:1,2 c:4,2 ") { z(2) !in z(1) .. z(4) }
+
+    return "OK"
+}