[FIR] Properly calculate visibilities
`testIntersectionOfPrimitiveBasedFunctions` is fine, because we deprecate this already in ^KT-63243. `CANNOT_INFER_VISIBILITY` is positioned as `DECLARATION_NAME`, just in case we decide for some reason that we do want to report it along with `MANY_*_NOT_IMPLEMENTED`. In that case, we'd get a problem that their bounds overlap, but not completely contain one another. ^KT-63741 Fixed ^KT-59400 Fixed
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Space Team
parent
7056ad5325
commit
8f8c7fe7cf
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ fun Visibility.toEffectiveVisibility(
|
||||
}
|
||||
Visibilities.Public -> EffectiveVisibility.Public
|
||||
Visibilities.Local -> EffectiveVisibility.Local
|
||||
// Unknown visibility should not provoke errors,
|
||||
// because they can naturally appear when intersection
|
||||
// overrides' bases have inconsistent forms.
|
||||
Visibilities.Unknown -> EffectiveVisibility.Unknown
|
||||
else -> errorWithAttachment("Unknown visibility: $this") {
|
||||
withFirLookupTagEntry("owner", owner)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user