[FIR] Consider explicit returns during computing return type of anonymous function

Introduce FirAnonymousFunctionReturnExpressionInfo

^KT-59386

compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/functionLiterals/return/IfWithoutElseWithExplicitType.fir.kt

@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@ val a: () -> Int = <!INITIALIZER_TYPE_MISMATCH!>l@ {
     if (flag) return@l 4
 }<!>
 
-val b: () -> Unit = l@ {
+val b: () -> Unit = <!INITIALIZER_TYPE_MISMATCH!>l@ {
     if (flag) return@l 4
-}
+}<!>
 
 val c: () -> Any = l@ {
     if (flag) return@l 4

compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/inference/coercionToUnit/coercionWithExpectedType.fir.kt

@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ val a: () -> Unit = l@{
     if (true) 42
 }
 
-val b: () -> Unit = l@{
+val b: () -> Unit = <!INITIALIZER_TYPE_MISMATCH!>l@{
     // Error, coercion can't be applied at this position!
     if (true) return@l "hello"
 
     // However, this is OK, because here coercion is applied
     "hello"
-}
+}<!>
 
 val c: () -> Unit = {
     // Interesting enough, for such expessions we use expected type Unit