Add diagnostics to test data from NI
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ fun foo(i: Int) = i
|
||||
fun foo(s: String) = s
|
||||
|
||||
fun test() {
|
||||
<!NONE_APPLICABLE!>foo<!>(<!TYPE_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER!>emptyList<!>())
|
||||
<!NONE_APPLICABLE!>foo<!>(<!OI;TYPE_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER!>emptyList<!>())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun <T> emptyList(): List<T> {throw Exception()}
|
||||
Vendored
+14
-14
@@ -20,20 +20,20 @@ class E {
|
||||
// `bar` calls are inapplicable since both E nor D aren't proper receivers
|
||||
// But prior to this change, every lambda was analyzed repeatedly for every candidate
|
||||
// Thus, the resulting time was exponential
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ public class ResolutionTaskHolder<F, G : F> {
|
||||
tasks.add(ResolutionTask<F, G>(candidate))
|
||||
|
||||
//todo the problem is the type of ResolutionTask is inferred as ResolutionTask<F, F> too early
|
||||
tasks.<!TYPE_INFERENCE_CONFLICTING_SUBSTITUTIONS!>bar<!>(ResolutionTask(candidate))
|
||||
tasks.<!OI;TYPE_INFERENCE_CONFLICTING_SUBSTITUTIONS!>bar<!>(ResolutionTask(candidate))
|
||||
tasks.add(ResolutionTask(candidate))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user