Hacked SliceNullnessAnalyzerBase from IDEA to take into account SliceUsage.isLeaf() and give reasonable and stable results for Kotlin
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,11 +1,28 @@
|
||||
[NotNull Values]
|
||||
7 with(123) <bold>{</bold>
|
||||
7 with(<bold>123</bold>) {
|
||||
3 fun <bold>Any</bold>.extensionFun() {
|
||||
7 [LAMBDA CALLS] with(123) <bold>{</bold>
|
||||
19 [LAMBDA CALLS] withNoInline(1) <bold>{</bold>
|
||||
44 (INLINE CALL with) [LAMBDA CALLS] inline fun <T, R> with(receiver: T, <bold>block: T.() -> R</bold>): R {
|
||||
45 (INLINE CALL with) val result = <bold>receiver</bold>.block()
|
||||
44 (INLINE CALL with) inline fun <T, R> with(<bold>receiver: T</bold>, block: T.() -> R): R {
|
||||
7 with(<bold>123</bold>) {
|
||||
12 <bold>this</bold>.extensionFun()
|
||||
3 fun <bold>Any</bold>.extensionFun() {
|
||||
12 <bold>this</bold>.extensionFun()
|
||||
19 withNoInline(<bold>1</bold>) {
|
||||
3 fun <bold>Any</bold>.extensionFun() {
|
||||
19 [LAMBDA CALLS] withNoInline(1) <bold>{</bold>
|
||||
53 [LAMBDA CALLS] fun <T, R> withNoInline(receiver: T, <bold>block: T.() -> R</bold>): R {
|
||||
54 val result = <bold>receiver</bold>.block()
|
||||
53 fun <T, R> withNoInline(<bold>receiver: T</bold>, block: T.() -> R): R {
|
||||
19 withNoInline(<bold>1</bold>) {
|
||||
23 withNoInline(<bold>2</bold>) {
|
||||
3 fun <bold>Any</bold>.extensionFun() {
|
||||
19 [LAMBDA CALLS] withNoInline(1) <bold>{</bold>
|
||||
53 [LAMBDA CALLS] fun <T, R> withNoInline(receiver: T, <bold>block: T.() -> R</bold>): R {
|
||||
54 val result = <bold>receiver</bold>.block()
|
||||
53 fun <T, R> withNoInline(<bold>receiver: T</bold>, block: T.() -> R): R {
|
||||
23 withNoInline(<bold>2</bold>) {
|
||||
36 <bold>it</bold>.extensionFun()
|
||||
3 fun <bold>Any</bold>.extensionFun() {
|
||||
28 <bold>it</bold>.extensionFun()
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user