Revert "Revert "Instantiation of annotations for JVM IR with the corresponding feature flag""

Fix incorrectly rebased ce0a3a57df This reverts commit 3d0126d5
2021-07-21 18:22:29 +03:00
parent 54b9ad6bf5
commit 83c1a75c1e
60 changed files with 1593 additions and 64 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
+// TARGET_BACKEND: JVM_IR
+
+// WITH_RUNTIME
+// !LANGUAGE: +InstantiationOfAnnotationClasses
+
+// FILE: A.java
+
+public @interface A {}
+
+// FILE: B.java
+
+public @interface B {
+    String value();
+}
+
+// FILE: C.java
+
+public @interface C {
+    int[] v1();
+    String v2();
+}
+
+// FILE: D.java
+
+public @interface D {
+    String value() default "hello";
+}
+
+// FILE: b.kt
+
+fun box(): String {
+    val a = A()
+    val b = B("OK")
+    assert(b.value == "OK")
+    val c = C(v2 = "v2", v1 = intArrayOf(1))
+    assert(c.v2 == "v2")
+    // TODO(KT-47702): Looks like we have to force users either to pass default java parameters explicitly
+    // or hack LazyJavaClassDescriptor/JavaPropertyDescriptor to load annotation param default value,
+    // because it is not stored currently anywhere.
+    // val d = D()
+    val d = D("OK").value
+    return d
+}