[FIR] Add a class representing the old syntax contract description in order to use the previous class for the new syntax
This commit is contained in:
+1
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ object FirTreeBuilder : AbstractFirTreeBuilder() {
|
||||
val effectDeclaration = element("EffectDeclaration", Contracts)
|
||||
|
||||
val contractDescription = element("ContractDescription", Contracts)
|
||||
val legacyRawContractDescription = element("LegacyRawContractDescription", Contracts, contractDescription)
|
||||
val rawContractDescription = element("RawContractDescription", Contracts, contractDescription)
|
||||
val resolvedContractDescription = element("ResolvedContractDescription", Contracts, contractDescription)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+5
-1
@@ -610,13 +610,17 @@ object NodeConfigurator : AbstractFieldConfigurator<FirTreeBuilder>(FirTreeBuild
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rawContractDescription.configure {
|
||||
+field("contractCall", functionCall)
|
||||
+fieldList("rawEffects", expression)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
resolvedContractDescription.configure {
|
||||
+fieldList("effects", effectDeclaration)
|
||||
+fieldList("unresolvedEffects", statement)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
legacyRawContractDescription.configure {
|
||||
+field("contractCall", functionCall)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user