[FIR] Don't create synthetic property if getter and property came from the same class

Usually we create synthetic property in java class if there is a property
  from the base kotlin class and getter/setter with a corresponding name
  in the declared scope or one of supertype scopes. But there is a case,
  where the same supertype contains both property and getter:
```
// FILE: Base.kt
open class Base {
    open val b = "O"

    @JvmName("getBJava")
    fun getB() : String = "K"
}

// FILE: Derived.java
public class Derived extends Base {}
```

In this case we shouldn't create synthetic property, because `getB()`
  function is invisible for `Derived` class

^KT-66020 Fixed

compiler/tests-gen/org/jetbrains/kotlin/codegen/LightAnalysisModeTestGenerated.java

@@ -30217,6 +30217,11 @@ public class LightAnalysisModeTestGenerated extends AbstractLightAnalysisModeTes
       runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/box/jvmName/classMembers.kt");
     }
 
+    @TestMetadata("conflictingGetterAndPropertyInBaseKotlinClass.kt")
+    public void testConflictingGetterAndPropertyInBaseKotlinClass() {
+      runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/box/jvmName/conflictingGetterAndPropertyInBaseKotlinClass.kt");
+    }
+
     @TestMetadata("fakeJvmNameInJava.kt")
     public void testFakeJvmNameInJava() {
       runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/box/jvmName/fakeJvmNameInJava.kt");