[NI] Improve diagnostic about unresolved receiver for many candidates

This commit is contained in:
Mikhail Zarechenskiy
2018-02-14 05:18:48 +03:00
parent 3afd4a2f4a
commit 694f5690f9
7 changed files with 89 additions and 44 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
fun test() {
val <!UNUSED_VARIABLE!>a<!> = <!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>-<!>false
}
operator fun A.unaryMinus() {}
operator fun B.unaryMinus() {}
class A
class B
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
package
public fun test(): kotlin.Unit
public operator fun A.unaryMinus(): kotlin.Unit
public operator fun B.unaryMinus(): kotlin.Unit
public final class A {
public constructor A()
public open override /*1*/ /*fake_override*/ fun equals(/*0*/ other: kotlin.Any?): kotlin.Boolean
public open override /*1*/ /*fake_override*/ fun hashCode(): kotlin.Int
public open override /*1*/ /*fake_override*/ fun toString(): kotlin.String
}
public final class B {
public constructor B()
public open override /*1*/ /*fake_override*/ fun equals(/*0*/ other: kotlin.Any?): kotlin.Boolean
public open override /*1*/ /*fake_override*/ fun hashCode(): kotlin.Int
public open override /*1*/ /*fake_override*/ fun toString(): kotlin.String
}
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ fun Int.invoke(a: Int, b: Int) {}
class SomeClass
fun test(identifier: SomeClass, fn: String.() -> Unit) {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;DEBUG_INFO_MISSING_UNRESOLVED, OI;FUNCTION_EXPECTED!>identifier<!>()
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>identifier<!>(123)
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>identifier<!>(1, 2)
<!FUNCTION_EXPECTED, DEBUG_INFO_MISSING_UNRESOLVED!>identifier<!>()
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>identifier<!>(123)
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>identifier<!>(1, 2)
1.<!NI;DEBUG_INFO_MISSING_UNRESOLVED!><!NI;DEBUG_INFO_UNRESOLVED_WITH_TARGET, UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>fn<!>()<!>
}
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
// !WITH_NEW_INFERENCE
// !DIAGNOSTICS: -UNUSED_PARAMETER
class A
@@ -20,20 +19,20 @@ class E {
// `bar` calls are inapplicable since both E nor D aren't proper receivers
// But prior to this change, every lambda was analyzed repeatedly for every candidate
// Thus, the resulting time was exponential
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!NI;NONE_APPLICABLE, OI;UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE_WRONG_RECEIVER!>bar<!> {
}
}