[FIR] KT-55503: Prefer members-extensions over @HidesMembers extensions

Passing `EXTENSION_RECEIVER` when processing `noReceiver`
looks like a mistake in general. This change is backed
by the `hidesMembers` and
`memberWithHidesMemberAnnotationVsMemberWithout` tests.

The exact reason with `memberWithHidesMemberAnnotationVsMemberWithout`
is that it first checks `@HidesMembers` candidates,
only takes the `kotlin/collections/Iterable<T>.forEach`,
but then yields `InapplicableWrongReceiver`,
because `explicitReceiverKind = EXTENSION_RECEIVER`
(which is strange, because we really don't have an explicit receiver).
Then we visit the same scope once more (now for all candidates)
and take 2 functions:

- `kotlin/collections/Iterable<T>.forEach`
- `kotlin/sequence/Sequence<T>.forEach`

...and they both result in `RESOLVED`,
because this time `explicitReceiverKind = NO_EXPLICIT_RECEIVER`.

This change ensures the first candidate we see
while checking `@HidesMembers` is taken as `RESOLVED`.

^KT-55503 Fixed

compiler/testData/diagnostics/testsWithStdLib/kt55503_2.kt

@@ -25,8 +25,7 @@ import sample.pack.*
 fun box() {
     return with(A()) {
         with(B()) {
-            // K1 resolves to A::B.check
-            // K2 - to ::A.check
+            // Both K1 & K2 resolve to A::B.check
             forEach()
         }
     }