[FIR] KT-55503: Prefer members-extensions over @HidesMembers extensions
Passing `EXTENSION_RECEIVER` when processing `noReceiver` looks like a mistake in general. This change is backed by the `hidesMembers` and `memberWithHidesMemberAnnotationVsMemberWithout` tests. The exact reason with `memberWithHidesMemberAnnotationVsMemberWithout` is that it first checks `@HidesMembers` candidates, only takes the `kotlin/collections/Iterable<T>.forEach`, but then yields `InapplicableWrongReceiver`, because `explicitReceiverKind = EXTENSION_RECEIVER` (which is strange, because we really don't have an explicit receiver). Then we visit the same scope once more (now for all candidates) and take 2 functions: - `kotlin/collections/Iterable<T>.forEach` - `kotlin/sequence/Sequence<T>.forEach` ...and they both result in `RESOLVED`, because this time `explicitReceiverKind = NO_EXPLICIT_RECEIVER`. This change ensures the first candidate we see while checking `@HidesMembers` is taken as `RESOLVED`. ^KT-55503 Fixed
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Space Team
parent
906b16b41e
commit
603b46e531
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
fun foo() = withIntList {
|
||||
withStringSequence {
|
||||
forEach { line ->
|
||||
line.rem(1)
|
||||
line.<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE!>length<!>
|
||||
line.<!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE!>rem<!>(1)
|
||||
line.length
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user