[FIR] Improve UPPER_BOUND_VIOLATED message

Suggest removing explicit type arguments when the upper bound is a
captured type since the only way to satisfy the upper bounds is
by letting the type variable be inferred to its bound.

#KT-65681 Fixed

compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/inference/capturedTypes/capturedUpperBound.diag.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+

compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/inference/capturedTypes/capturedUpperBound.fir.diag.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+/capturedUpperBound.fir.kt:(100,120): error: Type argument is not within its bounds: should be subtype of 'CapturedType(*)'. Consider removing the explicit type arguments.
+
+/capturedUpperBound.fir.kt:(136,150): error: Type argument is not within its bounds: should be subtype of 'CapturedType(*)'. Consider removing the explicit type arguments.
+
+/capturedUpperBound.fir.kt:(166,182): error: Type argument is not within its bounds: should be subtype of 'CapturedType(*)'. Consider removing the explicit type arguments.

compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/inference/capturedTypes/capturedUpperBound.fir.kt

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 // ISSUE: KT-65712
+// RENDER_DIAGNOSTICS_FULL_TEXT
 
 fun test(a: BodySpec<List<*>, *>) {
     a.value<<!UPPER_BOUND_VIOLATED!>BodySpec<List<*>, *><!>>()

compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/inference/capturedTypes/capturedUpperBound.kt

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 // ISSUE: KT-65712
+// RENDER_DIAGNOSTICS_FULL_TEXT
 
 fun test(a: BodySpec<List<*>, *>) {
     a.value<BodySpec<List<*>, *>>()