added a sample experiment comparing Scala's use of Option[T] and how we can use T? in Kotlin today together with how we may support it in the future

This commit is contained in:
James Strachan
2012-03-16 10:59:03 +00:00
parent 406b8fa6a5
commit 46b5b1b177
2 changed files with 145 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
package language.scala
import kotlin. *
import kotlin.test.assertEquals
import junit.framework.TestCase
import kotlin.util.arrayList
/**
* This test case shows how we can use T?, the Kotlin nullable type instead of Option[T] in Scala
*
* Its worth saying that nullable types have 2 huge benefits over Option:
*
* * Already works with any Java or JVM based API which can return nulls
* * No extra object construction to wrap non-null values
*
* Examples taken from the [Scala API docs for Option](http://www.scala-lang.org/api/current/scala/Option.html)
*
* Note that currently the Kotlin library doesn't support the composition API of collections on T? like Scala's Option[T] does...
*/
class OptionTest: TestCase() {
fun testPatternMatching() {
fun foo(name: String?): String {
/* Scala:
val nameMaybe = request.getParameter("name")
nameMaybe match {
case Some(name) => {
name.trim.toUppercase
}
case None => {
"No name value"
}
}
*/
// Kotlin version:
return when (name) {
is String -> {
name.trim().toUpperCase()
}
else -> {
"No name value"
}
}
}
assertEquals("No name value", foo(null))
assertEquals("BAR", foo("BAR"))
assertEquals("BAR", foo(" bar "))
println("foo(null) = ${foo(null)}")
println("foo(\" bar \") = ${foo(" bar ")}")
}
fun testPatternMatchingUsingIf() {
fun foo2(name: String?): String {
/* Scala:
val nameMaybe = request.getParameter("name")
nameMaybe match {
case Some(name) => {
name.trim.toUppercase
}
case None => {
"No name value"
}
}
*/
// Kotlin version
return if (name != null) {
name.trim().toUpperCase()
} else {
"No name value"
}
}
assertEquals("No name value", foo2(null))
assertEquals("BAR", foo2("BAR"))
assertEquals("BAR", foo2(" bar "))
println("foo2(null) = ${foo2(null)}")
println("foo2(\" bar \") = ${foo2(" bar ")}")
}
fun testFunctionComposition() {
/* Scala:
val name:Option[String] = request.getParameter("name")
val upper = name map { _.trim } filter { _.length != 0 } map { _.toUpperCase }
println(upper.getOrElse(""))
*/
/** TODO
The following would work if we implemented the filter/map methods on T?
fun foo(name: String?): String {
val upper = name.map<String,String>{ it.trim() }.filter{ it.length != 0 }.map { it.toUpperCase() }
return upper ?: ""
}
assertEquals("", foo(null))
assertEquals("", foo(" "))
assertEquals("BAR", foo(" bar "))
*/
// TODO...
}
fun testCompositionWithFor() {
fun foo3(name: String?): String {
/* Scala:
val upper = for {
name <- request.getParameter("name")
trimmed <- Some(name.trim)
upper <- Some(trimmed.toUpperCase) if trimmed.length != 0
} yield upper
println(upper.getOrElse(""))
*/
// Kotlin version
// not as clean as we've no way to compose if statements so have
// to cheat and use returns
if (name != null) {
val trimmed = name.trim()
if (trimmed.length() != 0) {
return trimmed.toUpperCase()
}
}
return ""
}
}
}