azalea/kotlin-fork
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

FIR: Rework checking dispatch receivers applicability

Browse Source 
Using `ownerLookupTag` might be wrong in case of private constuctors
 of inner classes: their owner is an Inner class, but expected
 dispach receiver is Outer
This commit is contained in:
Denis.Zharkov
2022-05-30 19:05:47 +03:00
committed by teamcity
parent 67e6687e89
commit 461d91a10e
8 changed files with 72 additions and 21 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
compiler/fir/java/src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/fir/java/FirJavaVisibilityChecker.kt
+1 -4
View File
@@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ import org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.resolve.SupertypeSupplier
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.resolve.calls.FirSimpleSyntheticPropertySymbol
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.resolve.calls.ReceiverValue
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.symbols.FirBasedSymbol
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.symbols.impl.FirNamedFunctionSymbol
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.symbols.impl.FirPropertyAccessorSymbol
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.symbols.impl.FirVariableSymbol
@NoMutableState
object FirJavaVisibilityChecker : FirVisibilityChecker() {
@@ -40,7 +37,7 @@ object FirJavaVisibilityChecker : FirVisibilityChecker() {
} else {
val ownerLookupTag = symbol.getOwnerLookupTag() ?: return false
if (canSeeProtectedMemberOf(
containingDeclarations, dispatchReceiver, ownerLookupTag, session,
symbol, containingDeclarations, dispatchReceiver, ownerLookupTag, session,
isVariableOrNamedFunction = symbol.isVariableOrNamedFunction(),
isSyntheticProperty = symbol.fir is FirSyntheticPropertyAccessor,
supertypeSupplier