azalea/kotlin-fork
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[FIR] Make resolution of classes in FirProvider more reasonable.

Browse Source 
See the `privateInFile.fir.kt` test.
Type mismatches are simply confusing.

`inheritorOfExpectSealedClass.out`
reports unresolved reference probably
because now it resolves into the expect
declaration, rather than the actual one.
K1 doesn't report UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE
in this case. But this is red code
anyway. And this behavior still
depends on the order in which the compiler
receives both the declarations.

^KT-59927
^KT-62567
This commit is contained in:
Nikolay Lunyak
2023-10-04 13:47:57 +03:00
committed by Space Team
parent a9ceae9667
commit 41c3f98419
7 changed files with 23 additions and 132 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
compiler/fir/analysis-tests/testData/resolve/diagnostics/conflictingOverloads.kt
Vendored
+4 -4
View File
@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ class <!PACKAGE_OR_CLASSIFIER_REDECLARATION!>A<!> {
}
class <!PACKAGE_OR_CLASSIFIER_REDECLARATION!>B<!> : <!FINAL_SUPERTYPE, SUPERTYPE_NOT_INITIALIZED!>A<!> {
<!CONFLICTING_OVERLOADS!><!NOTHING_TO_OVERRIDE!>override<!> fun rest(s: String)<!> {}
class <!PACKAGE_OR_CLASSIFIER_REDECLARATION!>B<!> : <!SUPERTYPE_NOT_INITIALIZED!>A<!> {
<!CONFLICTING_OVERLOADS!>override fun rest(s: String)<!> {}
<!CONFLICTING_OVERLOADS!>fun rest(s: String)<!> {}
<!CONFLICTING_OVERLOADS!>fun <!VIRTUAL_MEMBER_HIDDEN!>rest<!>(s: String)<!> {}
fun rest(l: Long) {}
<!NOTHING_TO_OVERRIDE!>override<!> val u = 310
override val u = 310
}
interface <!PACKAGE_OR_CLASSIFIER_REDECLARATION!>B<!>