JVM IR: fix names of $annotations methods with inline classes in signature
#KT-40385 Fixed
This commit is contained in:
+5
@@ -807,6 +807,11 @@ public class BytecodeListingTestGenerated extends AbstractBytecodeListingTest {
|
||||
KotlinTestUtils.assertAllTestsPresentByMetadataWithExcluded(this.getClass(), new File("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/inlineClasses"), Pattern.compile("^(.+)\\.kt$"), null, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("annotatedPropertyWithInlineClassTypeInSignature.kt")
|
||||
public void testAnnotatedPropertyWithInlineClassTypeInSignature() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/inlineClasses/annotatedPropertyWithInlineClassTypeInSignature.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("annotationsOnHiddenConstructor.kt")
|
||||
public void testAnnotationsOnHiddenConstructor() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/inlineClasses/annotationsOnHiddenConstructor.kt");
|
||||
|
||||
+5
@@ -777,6 +777,11 @@ public class IrBytecodeListingTestGenerated extends AbstractIrBytecodeListingTes
|
||||
KotlinTestUtils.assertAllTestsPresentByMetadataWithExcluded(this.getClass(), new File("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/inlineClasses"), Pattern.compile("^(.+)\\.kt$"), null, TargetBackend.JVM_IR, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("annotatedPropertyWithInlineClassTypeInSignature.kt")
|
||||
public void testAnnotatedPropertyWithInlineClassTypeInSignature() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/inlineClasses/annotatedPropertyWithInlineClassTypeInSignature.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("annotationsOnHiddenConstructor.kt")
|
||||
public void testAnnotationsOnHiddenConstructor() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeListing/inlineClasses/annotationsOnHiddenConstructor.kt");
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user