[IR] Add id method in interpreter's tests to avoid optimizations

This commit is contained in:
Ivan Kylchik
2023-04-11 17:23:11 +02:00
committed by Space Team
parent 621f5a0fb7
commit 3f60c83921
20 changed files with 552 additions and 532 deletions
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
// TARGET_BACKEND: NATIVE
// `Boolean.equals(Boolean)` will not be evaluated in K1
// IGNORE_BACKEND_K1: NATIVE
fun <T> T.id() = this
const val trueVal = <!EVALUATED("true")!>true<!>
const val falseVal = <!EVALUATED("false")!>false<!>
@@ -39,35 +40,35 @@ const val toString1 = trueVal.<!EVALUATED("true")!>toString()<!>
const val toString2 = falseVal.<!EVALUATED("false")!>toString()<!>
fun box(): String {
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>not1 != false<!>) return "Fail 1.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>not2 != true<!>) return "Fail 1.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>not1<!>.id() != false) return "Fail 1.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>not2<!>.id() != true) return "Fail 1.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>and1 != true<!>) return "Fail 2.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>and2 != false<!>) return "Fail 2.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>and3 != false<!>) return "Fail 2.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>and4 != false<!>) return "Fail 2.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>and1<!>.id() != true) return "Fail 2.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>and2<!>.id() != false) return "Fail 2.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>and3<!>.id() != false) return "Fail 2.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>and4<!>.id() != false) return "Fail 2.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>or1 != true<!>) return "Fail 3.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>or2 != true<!>) return "Fail 3.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>or3 != true<!>) return "Fail 3.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>or4 != false<!>) return "Fail 3.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>or1<!>.id() != true) return "Fail 3.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>or2<!>.id() != true) return "Fail 3.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>or3<!>.id() != true) return "Fail 3.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>or4<!>.id() != false) return "Fail 3.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>xor1 != false<!>) return "Fail 4.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>xor2 != true<!>) return "Fail 4.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>xor3 != true<!>) return "Fail 4.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>xor4 != false<!>) return "Fail 4.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>xor1<!>.id() != false) return "Fail 4.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>xor2<!>.id() != true) return "Fail 4.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>xor3<!>.id() != true) return "Fail 4.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>xor4<!>.id() != false) return "Fail 4.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>compareTo1 != 0<!>) return "Fail 5.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>compareTo2 != 1<!>) return "Fail 5.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>compareTo3 != -1<!>) return "Fail 5.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>compareTo4 != 0<!>) return "Fail 5.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("0")!>compareTo1<!>.id() != 0) return "Fail 5.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("1")!>compareTo2<!>.id() != 1) return "Fail 5.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("-1")!>compareTo3<!>.id() != -1) return "Fail 5.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("0")!>compareTo4<!>.id() != 0) return "Fail 5.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>equals1 != true<!>) return "Fail 6.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>equals2 != false<!>) return "Fail 6.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>equals3 != false<!>) return "Fail 6.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>equals4 != true<!>) return "Fail 6.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>equals1<!>.id() != true) return "Fail 6.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>equals2<!>.id() != false) return "Fail 6.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>equals3<!>.id() != false) return "Fail 6.3"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>equals4<!>.id() != true) return "Fail 6.4"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>toString1 != "true"<!>) return "Fail 7.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>toString2 != "false"<!>) return "Fail 7.2"
if (<!EVALUATED("true")!>toString1<!>.id() != "true") return "Fail 7.1"
if (<!EVALUATED("false")!>toString2<!>.id() != "false") return "Fail 7.2"
return "OK"
}