FIR: Fix leakage of type variables in builder inference for lambdas returning Unit
When BI/incomplete call is present in return argument, it will be added to the main call-tree, leading to requirement violation in `ConstraintSystemCompleter.getOrderedAllTypeVariables` as after `FirBuilderInferenceSession.inferPostponedVariables` it will be completed, and its type variables couldn't be found anymore In K1, we actually do the same, but we are able to find type variables of such calls due to architecture difference: In K2, `getOrderedAllTypeVariables` uses FIR as the main source to lookup In K1, `getOrderedAllTypeVariables` uses resolution atom tree, where candidate/CS of the call is still available after `inferPostponedVariables` In fact, all incomplete calls were analyzed in FULL mode according to the contract of `FirBuilderInferenceSession.addPartiallyResolvedCall`. Thus, it means we normally shouldn't add them to the main call-tree, but accidentally do it as incomplete calls contain non-completed candidate This particular commit addresses the problem partially, only in cases when the expected return type for the lambda is Unit and when the incomplete call is located in the last expression of the lambda In such cases, we can skip the call from the last expression completely, since all potential calls there were analyzed in FULL mode, and couldn't introduce any useful info to the CS of the main call-tree ^KT-54294
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Space Team
parent
ae1622d059
commit
3e6b42083b
@@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ See `org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.resolve.inference.PostponedArgumentsAnalyzer.apply
|
||||
|
||||
Once the lambda body was analyzed return arguments are added into the call-tree
|
||||
|
||||
> ##### Note: Incomplete calls in return arguments
|
||||
> We don't add last expression of lambda to the call-tree as a return argument if its functional-type has Unit return-type, to
|
||||
> avoid situations when last expression contains incomplete call, see [Incomplete call in return arguments](#incomplete-call-in-return-arguments)
|
||||
|
||||
Then, we perform inference of postponed type variables
|
||||
|
||||
See `org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.resolve.inference.FirBuilderInferenceSession.inferPostponedVariables`
|
||||
@@ -207,4 +211,14 @@ type variable from the call-tree and solution from integration CS, loosing infor
|
||||
It causes unsound solutions in the call-tree CS
|
||||
#### Resulting substitution is unclear
|
||||
Its unclear why we mix stub type substitutor with type-variable-type substitutor, and why we need to manually handle substitution to error
|
||||
types
|
||||
types
|
||||
#### Incomplete call in return arguments
|
||||
If incomplete call is present among return arguments during [Lambda analysis finalization](#lambda-analysis-finalization) we add it to the
|
||||
main call-tree, but then complete it as part of [result writing](#result-write).
|
||||
|
||||
It leads to violation of contract in `org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.resolve.inference.ConstraintSystemCompleter.getOrderedAllTypeVariables` as type variables for completed call couldn't be found anymore
|
||||
|
||||
To avoid such problem, we have [workaround for lambdas with Unit return-type](#Note-Incomplete-calls-in-return-arguments), but problem still
|
||||
occurs:
|
||||
- When we have [lambdas with non-Unit return-type](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-58741)
|
||||
- When the [incomplete call is present in a return argument that isn't last expression](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-58742)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user