IR: preserve argument evaluation order more carefully

1. receivers should be evaluated before named arguments;
 2. just because an argument has no side effects doesn't mean it is not
    affected by the other arguments' side effects - in that case it
    should still be evaluated in source order.

 #KT-47660 Fixed

compiler/testData/codegen/box/argumentOrder/arguments.kt

@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
-
-fun test(a: String, b: String): String {
-    return a + b;
+class C(val x: String) {
+    fun test(a: String, b: String): String =
+        x + a + b
 }
 
+fun String.test(a: String, b: String): String =
+    this + a + b
+
 fun box(): String {
-    var res = "";
-    val call = test(b = {res += "K"; "K"}(), a = {res+="O"; "O"}())
-
-    if (res != "KO" || call != "OK") return "fail: $res != KO or $call != OK"
+    var res = ""
+    var call = {res += "1"; "x"}().test(b = {res += "2"; "b"}(), a = {res += "3"; "a"}())
+    if (res != "123" || call != "xab") return "fail1: $res != 123 or $call != xab"
 
+    res = ""
+    call = {res += "1"; C("x")}().test(b = {res += "2"; "b"}(), a = {res += "3"; "a"}())
+    if (res != "123" || call != "xab") return "fail2: $res != 123 or $call != xab"
     return "OK"
-}
+}

compiler/testData/codegen/box/argumentOrder/singleSideEffect.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+fun box(): String {
+    var x = "c"
+    val call = test(c = x, b = { x = "a"; "b" }(), a = x)
+    return if (call == "abc") "OK" else "fail: $call != abc"
+}
+
+fun test(a: String, b: String, c: String): String =
+    a + b + c