Generate classes in MultifileClassCodegen exactly the same as in PackageCodegen
Two known issues with generateNonPartClassDeclarations that was here before were the fact that we didn't sort sealed classes and its subclasses which led to NoSuchMethodError (KT-27097), and the fact that we didn't skip expect classes which led to incorrect duplicate JVM class name diagnostic (KT-30843) #KT-27097 Fixed #KT-30843 Fixed
This commit is contained in:
+10
@@ -15822,6 +15822,11 @@ public class BlackBoxCodegenTestGenerated extends AbstractBlackBoxCodegenTest {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/box/multifileClasses/samePartNameDifferentFacades.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("sealedClassHierarchy.kt")
|
||||
public void testSealedClassHierarchy() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/box/multifileClasses/sealedClassHierarchy.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("compiler/testData/codegen/box/multifileClasses/optimized")
|
||||
@TestDataPath("$PROJECT_ROOT")
|
||||
@RunWith(JUnit3RunnerWithInners.class)
|
||||
@@ -15878,6 +15883,11 @@ public class BlackBoxCodegenTestGenerated extends AbstractBlackBoxCodegenTest {
|
||||
KotlinTestUtils.assertAllTestsPresentByMetadata(this.getClass(), new File("compiler/testData/codegen/box/multiplatform"), Pattern.compile("^(.+)\\.kt$"), TargetBackend.JVM, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("expectClassInJvmMultifileFacade.kt")
|
||||
public void testExpectClassInJvmMultifileFacade() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/box/multiplatform/expectClassInJvmMultifileFacade.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("noArgActualConstructor.kt")
|
||||
public void testNoArgActualConstructor() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/codegen/box/multiplatform/noArgActualConstructor.kt");
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user