[IR] Unite inline class and multi-field value class representation
#KT-1179
This commit is contained in:
committed by
teamcity
parent
282ab398c6
commit
28bf83ceac
@@ -242,18 +242,9 @@ message Class {
|
||||
optional Type inline_class_underlying_type = 18;
|
||||
optional int32 inline_class_underlying_type_id = 19 [(type_id_in_table) = true];
|
||||
|
||||
message MultiFieldValueClassRepresentation {
|
||||
message MultiFieldValueClassProperty {
|
||||
required int32 name = 1;
|
||||
oneof type_representation {
|
||||
Type type = 2;
|
||||
int32 type_id = 3;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
repeated MultiFieldValueClassProperty property = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
optional MultiFieldValueClassRepresentation multi_field_value_class_representation = 22;
|
||||
repeated int32 multi_field_value_class_underlying_name = 22 [packed = true, (name_id_in_table) = true];
|
||||
repeated Type multi_field_value_class_underlying_type = 23;
|
||||
repeated int32 multi_field_value_class_underlying_type_id = 24 [packed = true, (type_id_in_table) = true];
|
||||
|
||||
optional TypeTable type_table = 30;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
Reference in New Issue
Block a user