[FIR] NO_ACTUAL_CLASS_MEMBER_FOR_EXPECTED_CLASS: report both mismatches and incompatibilites
This commit is a preparation step for KT-59887. For now, expectActualInlineClass.fir.kt became slightly more verbose. Once is KT-59887 fixed, the verbosity will go away. Because we won't report incompatibilites mismatches for ACTUAL_MISSING declarations Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/13094/timeline
This commit is contained in:
Vendored
+1
-1
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ expect inline class NonInlineActual(val x: Int)
|
||||
actual inline class Foo1(val x: Int) {
|
||||
actual fun bar(): String = "Hello"
|
||||
}
|
||||
actual inline class <!NO_ACTUAL_CLASS_MEMBER_FOR_EXPECTED_CLASS!>Foo2<!>(val x: String)
|
||||
actual inline class <!NO_ACTUAL_CLASS_MEMBER_FOR_EXPECTED_CLASS, NO_ACTUAL_CLASS_MEMBER_FOR_EXPECTED_CLASS!>Foo2<!>(val x: String)
|
||||
actual <!ABSENCE_OF_PRIMARY_CONSTRUCTOR_FOR_VALUE_CLASS!>inline<!> class Foo3
|
||||
|
||||
actual inline class <!ACTUAL_WITHOUT_EXPECT!>NonInlineExpect<!>(val x: Int)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user