Update nullability assertion tests that use newer Java features

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaCollectionOfExplicitNotNull.kt

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 // TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // FILE: box.kt
 import kotlin.test.*

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaCollectionOfExplicitNotNullFailFast.kt

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // Note: This fails on JVM (non-IR) with "Fail: should throw on get() in loop header". The not-null assertion is not generated when
 // assigning to the loop variable. The root cause seems to be that the loop variable is a KtParameter and

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaCollectionOfExplicitNullable.kt

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 // TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // FILE: box.kt
 import kotlin.test.*

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaCollectionOfInheritedNotNull.kt

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ public class JImpl implements J {
     // Type argument (Int) gets @EnhancedNullability because it is not nullable in overridden Kotlin function.
     @Override
     public List<Integer> listOfNotNull() {
-        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();
+        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
         list.add(42);
         list.add(-42);
         return list;

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaCollectionOfMaybeNullable.kt

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ import java.util.*;
 
 public class J {
     public static List<Integer> listOfMaybeNullable() {
-        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();
+        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
         list.add(42);
         list.add(null);
         return list;

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaCollectionOfMaybeNullableWithNotNullLoopVariable.kt

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ import java.util.*;
 
 public class J {
     public static List<Integer> listOfMaybeNullable() {
-        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();
+        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
         list.add(42);
         list.add(-42);
         return list;

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaCollectionOfNotNullToTypedArray.kt

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 // TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // FILE: box.kt
 import kotlin.test.*

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaCollectionOfNotNullToTypedArrayFailFast.kt

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // Note: This fails on JVM (non-IR) with "Fail: should throw on get() in loop header". The not-null assertion is not generated when
 // assigning to the loop variable. The root cause seems to be that the loop variable is a KtParameter and

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaIteratorOfNotNull.kt

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 // TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // FILE: box.kt
 import kotlin.test.*

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/javaIteratorOfNotNullFailFast.kt

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // Note: This fails on JVM (non-IR) with "Fail: should throw on get() in loop header". The not-null assertion is not generated when
 // assigning to the loop variable. The root cause seems to be that the loop variable is a KtParameter and

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/withIndex/javaCollectionOfExplicitNotNullWithIndex.kt

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 // TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // FILE: box.kt
 import kotlin.test.*

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/withIndex/javaCollectionOfExplicitNotNullWithIndexFailFast.kt

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // Note: This fails on JVM (non-IR) with "Fail: should throw on get()". The not-null assertion is not generated when assigning to the
 // variables in the destructuring declaration. The root cause seems to be that

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/withIndex/javaCollectionOfExplicitNullableWithIndex.kt

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 // TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // FILE: box.kt
 import kotlin.test.*

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/withIndex/javaCollectionOfMaybeNullableWithIndex.kt

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ import java.util.*;
 
 public class J {
     public static List<Integer> listOfMaybeNullable() {
-        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();
+        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
         list.add(42);
         list.add(null);
         return list;

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/withIndex/javaCollectionOfMaybeNullableWithIndexWithNotNullLoopVariable.kt

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ import java.util.*;
 
 public class J {
     public static List<Integer> listOfMaybeNullable() {
-        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();
+        List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
         list.add(42);
         list.add(-42);
         return list;

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/withIndex/javaIteratorOfNotNullWithIndex.kt

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 // TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // FILE: box.kt
 import kotlin.test.*

compiler/testData/codegen/box/ranges/javaInterop/withIndex/javaIteratorOfNotNullWithIndexFailFast.kt

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
 // WITH_RUNTIME
+// JVM_TARGET: 1.8
 
 // Note: This fails on JVM (non-IR) with "Fail: should throw on get()". The not-null assertion is not generated when assigning to the
 // variables in the destructuring declaration. The root cause seems to be that