JVM optimize out temporary variables in bytecode

This commit is contained in:
Dmitry Petrov
2021-08-13 12:38:20 +03:00
committed by TeamCityServer
parent bddfd086f6
commit 041773fd25
22 changed files with 964 additions and 44 deletions
@@ -1,12 +1,3 @@
// FILE: J.java
import org.jetbrains.annotations.NotNull;
public interface J {
@NotNull
public Integer foo();
}
// FILE: test.kt
fun Long.id() = this
fun Short.id() = this
@@ -15,29 +6,20 @@ fun String.drop2() = if (length >= 2) subSequence(2, length) else null
fun doSimple1(s: String?) = s?.length == 3
fun doJava1(s: String?, j: J) = s?.length == j.foo()
fun doLongReceiver1(x: Long?) = x?.id() == 3L
fun doShortReceiver1(x: Short?, y: Short) = x?.id() == y
fun doChain1(s: String?) = s?.drop2()?.length == 1
fun doIf1(s: String?) =
if (s?.length == 1) "A" else "B"
fun doSimple2(s: String?) = 3 == s?.length
fun doJava2(s: String?, j: J) = j.foo() == s?.length
fun doLongReceiver2(x: Long?) = 3L == x?.id()
fun doShortReceiver2(x: Short?, y: Short) = y == x?.id()
fun doChain2(s: String?) = 1 == s?.drop2()?.length
fun doIf2(s: String?) =
if (1 == s?.length) "A" else "B"
// `doJava1`/`doJava2` box `s?.length` instead of unboxing `j.foo()`:
// 2 valueOf
// 0 valueOf
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
fun String.drop2() = if (length >= 2) subSequence(2, length) else null
fun doChain1(s: String?) = s?.drop2()?.length == 1
fun doChain2(s: String?) = 1 == s?.drop2()?.length
// 0 valueOf
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
// FILE: J.java
import org.jetbrains.annotations.NotNull;
public interface J {
@NotNull
public Integer foo();
}
// FILE: safeCallToPrimitiveEquality3.kt
fun doJava1(s: String?, j: J) = s?.length == j.foo()
fun doJava2(s: String?, j: J) = j.foo() == s?.length
// `doJava1`/`doJava2` box `s?.length` instead of unboxing `j.foo()`:
// 2 valueOf
@@ -13,5 +13,5 @@ fun test(x: A?) {
// 0 ACONST_NULL
// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
// 1 POP
// 2 POP
// 0 ACONST_NULL
@@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ fun test(ss: List<String?>) {
// 2 POP
// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
// 1 POP
// 2 POP
@@ -14,12 +14,12 @@ fun main(args: Array<String>) {
@BuilderInference
suspend fun SequenceScope<Int>.awaitSeq(): Int = 42
// 1 LINENUMBER 9 L18
// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
// 1 LINENUMBER 8 L13
// 1 LOCALVARIABLE a I L[0-9]+ L4
// JVM_TEMPLATES
// 1 LINENUMBER 9 L18
// 1 LOCALVARIABLE a I L[0-9]+ L18
// IGNORE_BACKEND_FIR: JVM_IR
@@ -12,6 +12,6 @@ fun f() {
// 1 LOCALVARIABLE c C L3 L\d+ 0
// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
// 1 ISTORE 2\s+L4
// 1 ISTORE 2\s+L3
// 1 ILOAD 2\s+INVOKEVIRTUAL java/io/PrintStream.print \(C\)V
// 1 LOCALVARIABLE c C L4 L\d+ 2
// 1 LOCALVARIABLE c C L3 L\d+ 2
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
class A(val b: B)
class B(val c: C)
class C(val s: String)
fun test(an: A?) = an?.b?.c?.s
// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
// 0 ASTORE
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
class A(val bn: B?)
class B(val cn: C?)
class C(val s: String)
fun test(an: A?) = an?.bn?.cn?.s
// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
// 0 ASTORE
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
class A
class B
class C
object Host {
val A.b: B get() = B()
val B.c: C get() = C()
val C.s: String get() = "s"
fun test(an: A?) = an?.b?.c?.s
}
// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
// 0 ASTORE
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
import Host.b
import Host.c
import Host.s
class A
class B
class C
object Host {
val A.b: B get() = B()
val B.c: C get() = C()
val C.s: String get() = "s"
}
fun test(an: A?) = an?.b?.c?.s
// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
// 0 ASTORE