[FIR] Remove FirLambdaArgumentExpression
It's not really necessary if the information about if the lambda was a trailing lambda can be directly saved in FirAnonymousFunctionExpression. Removing the FIR node uncovered a couple of bugs (UNINITIALIZED_ENUM_ENTRY, ERROR_IN_CONTRACT_DESCRIPTION) that were caused by assuming that a lambda is always a trailing lambda. #KT-66124
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Space Team
parent
1a5fa8d3f6
commit
03fc0fd381
Vendored
+1
-1
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
||||
val foo = { <!UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE!>bar<!> }(
|
||||
|
||||
<!SYNTAX!><!SYNTAX!><!>val<!> bar <!SYNTAX!><!SYNTAX!>=<!> <!TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM!>{ <!TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM, TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM!>foo<!> }<!><!>
|
||||
<!SYNTAX!><!SYNTAX!><!>val<!> bar <!SYNTAX!><!SYNTAX!>=<!> { <!TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM, TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM!>foo<!> }<!>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user