[FIR] Remove FirLambdaArgumentExpression
It's not really necessary if the information about if the lambda was a trailing lambda can be directly saved in FirAnonymousFunctionExpression. Removing the FIR node uncovered a couple of bugs (UNINITIALIZED_ENUM_ENTRY, ERROR_IN_CONTRACT_DESCRIPTION) that were caused by assuming that a lambda is always a trailing lambda. #KT-66124
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Space Team
parent
1a5fa8d3f6
commit
03fc0fd381
Vendored
+1
-1
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ FILE: [ResolvedTo(IMPORTS)] qualifiedCallInsideSuperCallScript.kts
|
||||
|
||||
public final [ResolvedTo(BODY_RESOLVE)] object C : R|A| {
|
||||
private [ResolvedTo(BODY_RESOLVE)] [ContainingClassKey=C] constructor(): R|C| {
|
||||
super<R|A|>([ResolvedTo(RAW_FIR)] fun R|A|.<anonymous>(): R|kotlin/Unit| <inline=Unknown> {
|
||||
super<R|A|>([ResolvedTo(RAW_FIR)] [MatchingParameterFunctionTypeKey=@ExtensionFunctionType kotlin/Function1<A, kotlin/Unit>] fun R|A|.<anonymous>(): R|kotlin/Unit| <inline=Unknown> {
|
||||
local final [ResolvedTo(RAW_FIR)] fun foo(): R|kotlin/String| {
|
||||
^foo Q|B|.R|/A.prop|.R|kotlin/String.toString|()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user