[FIR] Remove FirLambdaArgumentExpression
It's not really necessary if the information about if the lambda was a trailing lambda can be directly saved in FirAnonymousFunctionExpression. Removing the FIR node uncovered a couple of bugs (UNINITIALIZED_ENUM_ENTRY, ERROR_IN_CONTRACT_DESCRIPTION) that were caused by assuming that a lambda is always a trailing lambda. #KT-66124
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Space Team
parent
1a5fa8d3f6
commit
03fc0fd381
+12
@@ -658,6 +658,18 @@ public class FirStandaloneNormalAnalysisSourceModuleResolveCallTestGenerated ext
|
||||
runTest("analysis/analysis-api/testData/components/callResolver/resolveCall/kotlinPropertySetter_unqualified.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@TestMetadata("labeledLambda.kt")
|
||||
public void testLabeledLambda() {
|
||||
runTest("analysis/analysis-api/testData/components/callResolver/resolveCall/labeledLambda.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@TestMetadata("labeledLambdaInsideParentheses.kt")
|
||||
public void testLabeledLambdaInsideParentheses() {
|
||||
runTest("analysis/analysis-api/testData/components/callResolver/resolveCall/labeledLambdaInsideParentheses.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@TestMetadata("memberFunctionCallWithTypeArgument.kt")
|
||||
public void testMemberFunctionCallWithTypeArgument() {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user