[FIR] Remove FirLambdaArgumentExpression

It's not really necessary if the information about if the lambda was a
trailing lambda can be directly saved in FirAnonymousFunctionExpression.

Removing the FIR node uncovered a couple of bugs
(UNINITIALIZED_ENUM_ENTRY, ERROR_IN_CONTRACT_DESCRIPTION) that were
caused by assuming that a lambda is always a trailing lambda.

#KT-66124
This commit is contained in:
Kirill Rakhman
2024-03-04 11:59:13 +01:00
committed by Space Team
parent 1a5fa8d3f6
commit 03fc0fd381
66 changed files with 302 additions and 351 deletions
@@ -658,6 +658,18 @@ public class FirStandaloneNormalAnalysisSourceModuleResolveCallTestGenerated ext
runTest("analysis/analysis-api/testData/components/callResolver/resolveCall/kotlinPropertySetter_unqualified.kt");
}
@Test
@TestMetadata("labeledLambda.kt")
public void testLabeledLambda() {
runTest("analysis/analysis-api/testData/components/callResolver/resolveCall/labeledLambda.kt");
}
@Test
@TestMetadata("labeledLambdaInsideParentheses.kt")
public void testLabeledLambdaInsideParentheses() {
runTest("analysis/analysis-api/testData/components/callResolver/resolveCall/labeledLambdaInsideParentheses.kt");
}
@Test
@TestMetadata("memberFunctionCallWithTypeArgument.kt")
public void testMemberFunctionCallWithTypeArgument() {