[FIR] Properly handle nested annotations on compiler-required annotation phase
There was a case when we visited the same declaration multiple times because of forward-referencing and visiting with designation So because of this there were two changes required: - remove assertion about visiting the same declaration twice (it's fine since we don't actually resolve annotations twice) - not skipping resolution of class children if annotations on this class are already resolved ^KT-61388 Fixed KT-62854
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Space Team
parent
80257dc58f
commit
0325ffaa01
+6
@@ -767,6 +767,12 @@ public class DiagnosticCompilerTestFirTestdataTestGenerated extends AbstractDiag
|
||||
KtTestUtil.assertAllTestsPresentByMetadataWithExcluded(this.getClass(), new File("compiler/fir/analysis-tests/testData/resolve/annotations"), Pattern.compile("^([^.]+)\\.kt$"), null, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@TestMetadata("kindaCompilerRequiredNestedAnnotation.kt")
|
||||
public void testKindaCompilerRequiredNestedAnnotation() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/fir/analysis-tests/testData/resolve/annotations/kindaCompilerRequiredNestedAnnotation.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@TestMetadata("kt43936.kt")
|
||||
public void testKt43936() throws Exception {
|
||||
|
||||
+6
@@ -767,6 +767,12 @@ public class LLFirPreresolvedReversedDiagnosticCompilerFirTestDataTestGenerated
|
||||
KtTestUtil.assertAllTestsPresentByMetadataWithExcluded(this.getClass(), new File("compiler/fir/analysis-tests/testData/resolve/annotations"), Pattern.compile("^([^.]+)\\.kt$"), null, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@TestMetadata("kindaCompilerRequiredNestedAnnotation.kt")
|
||||
public void testKindaCompilerRequiredNestedAnnotation() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/fir/analysis-tests/testData/resolve/annotations/kindaCompilerRequiredNestedAnnotation.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@TestMetadata("kt43936.kt")
|
||||
public void testKt43936() throws Exception {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user