Fix incorrect coroutines codegen behavior

If all the suspension calls in a suspend function were "hidden"
under the for-convention (iterator/next/hasNext) calls,
control-flow didn't find them, thus supposing that there is no
suspension points and there is no need to generate a coroutine state machine

The solution is to add relevant calls to CFG

 #KT-15824 Fixed
This commit is contained in:
Denis Zharkov
2017-01-20 15:25:21 +03:00
parent 8cbea903f4
commit 02b40326cc
22 changed files with 609 additions and 291 deletions
+10 -10
View File
@@ -7,15 +7,15 @@ fun test(b: Boolean) {
}
---------------------
<v0>: Boolean NEW: magic[FAKE_INITIALIZER](b: Boolean) -> <v0>
<v4>: Int NEW: magic[LOOP_RANGE_ITERATION](1..10|<v3>) -> <v4>
<v7>: Int NEW: magic[LOOP_RANGE_ITERATION](1..10|<v6>) -> <v7>
1 <v1>: Int NEW: r(1) -> <v1>
10 <v2>: Int NEW: r(10) -> <v2>
1..10 <v3>: {<: Iterable<Int>} NEW: call(1..10, rangeTo|<v1>, <v2>) -> <v3>
b <v5>: Boolean NEW: r(b) -> <v5>
break !<v6>: *
if (b) break <v7>: * NEW: merge(if (b) break|!<v6>) -> <v7>
continue !<v8>: *
{ if (b) break; continue; } !<v8>: * COPY
for (i in 1..10) { if (b) break; continue; } !<v9>: *
{ for (i in 1..10) { if (b) break; continue; } } !<v9>: * COPY
=====================
1..10 <v6>: {<: Iterable<Int>} NEW: call(1..10, next) -> <v6>
b <v8>: Boolean NEW: r(b) -> <v8>
break !<v9>: *
if (b) break <v10>: * NEW: merge(if (b) break|!<v9>) -> <v10>
continue !<v11>: *
{ if (b) break; continue; } !<v11>: * COPY
for (i in 1..10) { if (b) break; continue; } !<v12>: *
{ for (i in 1..10) { if (b) break; continue; } } !<v12>: * COPY
=====================