diff --git a/exports/hykilp/atom.xml b/exports/hykilp/atom.xml index bdf9b89c0..245106dd5 100644 --- a/exports/hykilp/atom.xml +++ b/exports/hykilp/atom.xml @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ https://aza.moe/life 小桂桂的回忆录 📒 - 2023-05-30T22:07:48.386017+00:00 + 2023-05-31T00:08:50.552250+00:00 python-feedgen https://aza.moe/meru_256px.png diff --git a/exports/hykilp/index.html b/exports/hykilp/index.html index be9235ed2..b62fcc576 100644 --- a/exports/hykilp/index.html +++ b/exports/hykilp/index.html @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ diff --git a/exports/hykilp/posts.json b/exports/hykilp/posts.json index be6d8dd11..222dd8f69 100644 --- a/exports/hykilp/posts.json +++ b/exports/hykilp/posts.json @@ -25304,7 +25304,7 @@ "id": 1904, "date": "2023-03-05T19:50:53", "text": "rich logger 真的好好看!而且可以显示日志的行数和报错的本地变量也好方便。以后拿到 python 代码第一件事绝对是条件导入一个 rich 👍", - "views": 95, + "views": 96, "forwards": 3, "images": [ { @@ -29569,7 +29569,7 @@ "id": 2202, "date": "2023-05-23T01:21:58", "text": "读了这么多篇纸第一次遇到学术造假 😡\n\n标题和 Abstract 看起来可能能用在我的研究里就读一读吧,读着读着发现怎么全都是在说废话,说用 CNN 模型完全不描述架构,其他的模型也完全没提参数细节,源码数据也都没有公布。看它提到了一些相似研究,想先看看别人的吧,然后发现这篇论文下面的 17 篇引用没有一篇能查到 (╯’ – ‘)╯︵ ┻━┻\n\n为什么要这样造假,为什么音频研究投进仿生学和生物力学的期刊能被采纳,还是在 ChatGPT 公开访问之前投稿的... 不理解", - "views": 106, + "views": 107, "forwards": 1, "images": [ { diff --git a/exports/hykilp/rss.xml b/exports/hykilp/rss.xml index 14fd6725c..ccdfec595 100644 --- a/exports/hykilp/rss.xml +++ b/exports/hykilp/rss.xml @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ https://aza.moe/life zh-cn - Tue, 30 May 2023 22:07:48 +0000 + Wed, 31 May 2023 00:08:50 +0000 小桂桂的回忆录 📒 #2225 https://aza.moe/life?post=2225