[U] Update channel content
This commit is contained in:
github-actions
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="zh-cn">
|
||||
<id>https://aza.moe/life</id>
|
||||
<title>小桂桂的回忆录 📒</title>
|
||||
<updated>2025-12-24T20:20:18.392771+00:00</updated>
|
||||
<updated>2025-12-24T22:21:02.656939+00:00</updated>
|
||||
<link href="https://aza.moe/life" rel="alternate"/>
|
||||
<generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="0.9.0">python-feedgen</generator>
|
||||
<logo>https://aza.moe/meru_256px.png</logo>
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
@@ -77530,7 +77530,7 @@
|
||||
"id": 5626,
|
||||
"date": "2025-06-18T09:11:04",
|
||||
"text": "<i class=\"custom-emoji\" emoji-src=\"emoji/5406709143799085132.webp\">🌸</i>🙅♀️\n\n<span class=\"spoiler\"><span>好吧众所周知切手（きって）是邮票</span></span>",
|
||||
"views": 254,
|
||||
"views": 255,
|
||||
"forwards": 0,
|
||||
"images": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -77549,14 +77549,14 @@
|
||||
"id": 5627,
|
||||
"date": "2025-06-18T11:19:22",
|
||||
"text": "好想知道 如果让自己一直跟着看到的第一个箭头（离眼睛直线距离最近的箭头）走，直到看到下一个箭头或者走到一个看不到箭头的地方的话，会走到哪里\n\n还好想知道 如果从世界上每一个箭头开始走，最终停在哪里的次数最多\n<a href=\"##好奇心害死猫\">#好奇心害死猫</a>",
|
||||
"views": 246,
|
||||
"views": 247,
|
||||
"forwards": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 5628,
|
||||
"date": "2025-06-18T12:08:08",
|
||||
"text": "<a href=\"##冲绳\">#冲绳</a>\n第四站是美国<span class=\"spoiler\"><span>...村，一点都不美国</span></span>。但是至少看到了烟花和猫猫，听到了路边本地民谣演出，吃了也许很异端但是很好吃的分解塔可拌饭，味道有点像芝士肉沫意饭（之前发过照片了）",
|
||||
"views": 244,
|
||||
"views": 245,
|
||||
"forwards": 1,
|
||||
"media_group_id": 14001987906286413,
|
||||
"images": [
|
||||
@@ -101623,7 +101623,7 @@
|
||||
"id": 7580,
|
||||
"date": "2025-12-23T16:25:23",
|
||||
"text": "终于听上了之前在青葉市子演唱会买的黑胶 <i class=\"custom-emoji\" emoji-src=\"emoji/6170139473288890346.webm\">🤩</i>",
|
||||
"views": 148,
|
||||
"views": 149,
|
||||
"forwards": 1,
|
||||
"media_group_id": 14132056987065509,
|
||||
"images": [
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
|
||||
<link>https://aza.moe/life</link>
|
||||
</image>
|
||||
<language>zh-cn</language>
|
||||
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 20:20:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
|
||||
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 22:21:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
|
||||
<item>
|
||||
<title>小桂桂的回忆录 📒 #7582</title>
|
||||
<link>https://aza.moe/life?post=7582</link>
|
||||
|
||||
+27
-13
@@ -238,22 +238,24 @@
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"abstractNote": "The growing popularity of generative music models underlines the need for perceptually relevant, objective music quality metrics. The Frechet Audio Distance (FAD) is commonly used for this purpose even though its correlation with perceptual quality is understudied. We show that FAD performance may be hampered by sample size bias, poor choice of audio embeddings, or the use of biased or low-quality reference sets. We propose reducing sample size bias by extrapolating scores towards an infinite sample size. Through comparisons with MusicCaps labels and a listening test we identify audio embeddings and music reference sets that yield FAD scores well-correlated with acoustic and musical quality. Our results suggest that per-song FAD can be useful to identify outlier samples and predict perceptual quality for a range of music sets and generative models. Finally, we release a toolkit that allows adapting FAD for generative music evaluation.",
|
||||
"date": "2024-04",
|
||||
"proceedingsTitle": "ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)",
|
||||
"conferenceName": "ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)",
|
||||
"place": "",
|
||||
"publisher": "",
|
||||
"place": "",
|
||||
"date": "2024-04",
|
||||
"volume": "",
|
||||
"pages": "1331-1335",
|
||||
"series": "",
|
||||
"language": "",
|
||||
"DOI": "10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10446663",
|
||||
"ISBN": "",
|
||||
"shortTitle": "",
|
||||
"citationKey": "",
|
||||
"url": "https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10446663",
|
||||
"accessDate": "2024-11-15T00:01:02Z",
|
||||
"ISSN": "",
|
||||
"archive": "",
|
||||
"archiveLocation": "",
|
||||
"shortTitle": "",
|
||||
"language": "",
|
||||
"libraryCatalog": "IEEE Xplore",
|
||||
"callNumber": "",
|
||||
"rights": "All rights reserved",
|
||||
@@ -307,14 +309,18 @@
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"abstractNote": "",
|
||||
"publisher": "",
|
||||
"type": "",
|
||||
"date": "Dec 25, 2021",
|
||||
"language": "en",
|
||||
"shortTitle": "",
|
||||
"publisher": "",
|
||||
"place": "",
|
||||
"DOI": "",
|
||||
"citationKey": "",
|
||||
"url": "https://csc110.hydev.org/",
|
||||
"accessDate": "",
|
||||
"archive": "",
|
||||
"archiveLocation": "",
|
||||
"shortTitle": "",
|
||||
"language": "en",
|
||||
"libraryCatalog": "",
|
||||
"callNumber": "",
|
||||
"rights": "All rights reserved",
|
||||
@@ -374,14 +380,18 @@
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"abstractNote": "Does cognitive reflection correlate with decision making and biases? Two recent studies have correlated cognitive abilities with less bias and more desirable decisions. To verify these results, 129 participants completed a set of 13 questions consisting of standard cognitive reflection test questions and 6 evaluation questions like the two previous studies. Our results successfully replicated the negative correlation of cognitive abilities to denominator neglect and belief biases, but we did not replicate the correlations to the other 4 evaluations including delayed gratification, risk-aversion faced with either potential gains or losses, and conjunction fallacy. The lack of correlation for delayed gratification and risk-aversion might be caused by our different (likely wealthier) participants, which might provide evidence against the expected utility theory that the option with the best expected value is most desirable. The lack of correlation for conjunction fallacy is likely due to the different wording used in the question.",
|
||||
"publisher": "",
|
||||
"type": "",
|
||||
"date": "Dec 9 2021",
|
||||
"language": "en",
|
||||
"shortTitle": "",
|
||||
"publisher": "",
|
||||
"place": "",
|
||||
"DOI": "",
|
||||
"citationKey": "",
|
||||
"url": "",
|
||||
"accessDate": "",
|
||||
"archive": "",
|
||||
"archiveLocation": "",
|
||||
"shortTitle": "",
|
||||
"language": "en",
|
||||
"libraryCatalog": "",
|
||||
"callNumber": "",
|
||||
"rights": "All rights reserved",
|
||||
@@ -441,14 +451,18 @@
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"abstractNote": "Does natural doodling during lecture improve attention? A recent study by Andrade suggests that simulated doodling (shading in shapes) while listening will improve memory recall rate. However, their results might not extend to natural doodling. To investigate, 159 participants listened to a mock party invitation message with names to memorize. 69 of them were assigned to the doodling group where they freely doodled while listening. Unlike the study by Andrade, our study showed that the doodling group actually recalled 15% less names on a memory test. These results confirms that dual-tasking will hurt performance and shows that Andrade’s conclusions might only apply to shape-shading and not natural doodling. Further research could test whether the difference in results is due to natural doodling being more attention-demanding than shading, or if it is due to memory strategies such as rehearsal being used in the control group.",
|
||||
"publisher": "",
|
||||
"type": "",
|
||||
"date": "Nov 1, 2021",
|
||||
"language": "en",
|
||||
"shortTitle": "",
|
||||
"publisher": "",
|
||||
"place": "",
|
||||
"DOI": "",
|
||||
"citationKey": "",
|
||||
"url": "",
|
||||
"accessDate": "",
|
||||
"archive": "",
|
||||
"archiveLocation": "",
|
||||
"shortTitle": "",
|
||||
"language": "en",
|
||||
"libraryCatalog": "",
|
||||
"callNumber": "",
|
||||
"rights": "All rights reserved",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user