diff --git a/src/report/report_document.md b/src/report/report_document.md
index 878aa5a..1f22f4a 100644
--- a/src/report/report_document.md
+++ b/src/report/report_document.md
@@ -24,10 +24,24 @@ We might graph the frequencies on a histogram to gain more insight: (You can cli
     <div><img src="/freq/eng-news-hist-outliers.png" alt="hist"></div>
 </div>
 
-However, as you can see, the graphs are not very helpful because the majority of the sample post below 0.1%, and there are many outliers who post very frequently, like 40%. For example, if we sort the samples by their frequency, we have a few outliers who post more than 20% even in the random sample:
+However, as you can see, the graphs are not very helpful because the majority of the sample post below 0.1%, and there are many outliers who post very frequently, like 40%. For example, if we sort the samples by their frequency, we have a few outliers who post more than 20% even in `500-rand`:
 
 @include-cut `/freq/500-rand-top-20.md` 0 10
 
+So, we removed the outliers using the method proposed by Boris Iglewicz and David Hoaglin (1993) [[1]](#ref1) and ignoring everyone who posted below 0.1% and graphed the same histogram again:
+
+<div class="image-row">
+    <div><img src="/freq/500-pop-hist.png" alt="hist"></div>
+    <div><img src="/freq/500-rand-hist.png" alt="hist"></div>
+    <div><img src="/freq/eng-news-hist.png" alt="hist"></div>
+</div>
+
+As expected, the distributions looks right-skewed, with most people posting not very much. One interesting distinction is that, even though the distributions follow similar shapes, the x-axis ticks of `eng-news` is actually ten times larger than the other two, which means that `eng-news` post a lot more about COVID-19 on average than the other two samples. We can calculate some statistics of the samples to further verify this:
+
+@include `/freq/stats.md`
+
+Since there are many outliers, medians will more accurately represent the 
+
 ## COVID-19 Popularity Ratios
 
 To prevent division by zero, we ignored people who didn't post about COVID or didn't post at all.
@@ -39,3 +53,13 @@ Test Include:
 @include `/pop/ignored.md`
 
 @include `/pop/stats-with-outliers.md`
+
+
+## References
+
+<a id="ref1"></a>
+
+[1] Iglewicz, Boris, & David Hoaglin (1993), "Volume 16: How to Detect and
+Handle Outliers", _The ASQC Basic References in Quality Control:
+Statistical Techniques_, Edward F. Mykytka, Ph.D., Editor.
+
diff --git a/src/utils.py b/src/utils.py
index e23f936..853ac2b 100644
--- a/src/utils.py
+++ b/src/utils.py
@@ -173,8 +173,11 @@ def remove_outliers(points: list[float], z_threshold: float = 3.5) -> list[float
 
 class Stats(NamedTuple):
     mean: float
-    median: float
     stddev: float
+    median: float
+    iqr: float
+    q25: float
+    q75: float
 
 
 def get_statistics(points: list[float]) -> Stats:
@@ -184,7 +187,10 @@ def get_statistics(points: list[float]) -> Stats:
     :param points: Input points
     :return: Statistics
     """
-    return Stats(statistics.mean(points), statistics.median(points), statistics.stdev(points))
+    q75, q25 = np.percentile(points, [75, 25])
+    iqr = q75 - q25
+    return Stats(statistics.mean(points), statistics.stdev(points), statistics.median(points),
+                 iqr, q75, q25)
 
 
 def tabulate_stats(stats: list[Stats], percent: bool = False) -> list[list[str]]:
@@ -199,8 +205,12 @@ def tabulate_stats(stats: list[Stats], percent: bool = False) -> list[list[str]]
         return f'{n:.2f}' if not percent else f'{n * 100:.1f}%'
 
     return [['Mean'] + [num(s.mean) for s in stats],
+            ['StdDev'] + [num(s.stddev) for s in stats],
             ['Median'] + [num(s.median) for s in stats],
-            ['StdDev'] + [num(s.stddev) for s in stats]]
+            ['IQR'] + [num(s.iqr) for s in stats],
+            ['Q25%'] + [num(s.q25) for s in stats],
+            ['Q75%'] + [num(s.q75) for s in stats],
+            ]
 
 
 def parse_date(iso: str) -> datetime: